Representative Cases

We have represented clients in federal and state courtrooms across the country in a variety of complex cases. We have earned our clients’ confidence by the results we achieve.

Buckeye International, Inc. v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.,
2005WL 2406026 (E.D.Mo. 2005 WL) (denying defendant’s motion to transfer tortious interference case to Arizona).

Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp., et al.,
92 F. Supp.2d 945 (E.D.Mo. 2000) (fiduciary exception to attorney-client privilege).

Leavenworth/Lansing Physicians v. Cristiano v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.,
No. 2007CV 409 (Leavenworth County, Kansas District Court 2009) (granting summary judgment to third-party defendants on third-party plaintiff’s claims of common law fraud and securities fraud).

Lewis v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.,
500 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2007) (affirming dismissal of former employee’s attempt to re-file wrongful termination case in court after he lost in arbitration).

Mansur v. Trustees of Hickory Hill,
895 S.W.2d 611 (Mo. App. 1995) (trustees cannot unilaterally change long-standing interpretation of trust indenture documents).

Moore v. United States,
41 Fed.Cl. 394 (U.S. Court of Federal Claims 1998) (class action against United States government for inverse condemnation of land).

Reineke v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.,
2004 WL 442639 (N.D.Ill. 2004) (granting motion to compel arbitration of employee’s wrongful discharge claims).

Richardson v. Cambridge Manor, L.L.C., et al.,
2004 WL 392951 (S.D.Ind. 2004) (forcing plaintiffs to abandon most legal theories, as preempted by ERISA, in health insurance class action).

Simpson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.,
No. 03-LV-4235-JPG (S.D.Ill. 2004) (dismissing plaintiff’s claim based on loaned employee defense).

City of Springfield v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.,
203 S.W.3d 177 (Mo. 2006) (non-severability clause in legislative bill enforceable – where one provision of bill found unconstitutional, entire bill stricken).

Thornburg v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.,
2001 S.W.3d 421 (W.D.Mo. 2001) (employer cannot be held liable for employee’s extra-marital affair with co-worker).